Dutch Voters Reject EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (4/8)     Print Email

By Bill Marmon, Managing Editor European Affairs

Although the voter turnout was low and the result not binding, the resounding (61 percent to 38 percent) rejection by Dutch voters this week of the trade and cooperation agreement between Ukraine and the European Union was an embarrassment to supporters of European solidarity.

The referendum, organized by Euroskeptics, is non-binding since the Dutch parliament has already approved the Association Agreement with Ukraine—the same agreement that sparked the Maidan violence and government upheaval in Ukraine two years ago when the former prime minister refused to sign the agreement. But since the turnout this week of 32.2 percent was just above the 30 percent required for validity, it is likely that the Dutch parliament will reconsider the issue.

The other 27 EU nations have approved the Ukraine agreement and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko said after the vote that Ukraine will expand its cooperation with the EU, despite the Dutch rejection.

The Dutch vote was hailed by Euroskeptic politicians outside the Netherlands. Nigel Farage of UKIP, the UK Independence Party described the result as “hors d’oeuvres” before the “main course” of the UK’s referendum on EU membership on June 23.

Referendum organizers in the Netherlands, known as “Geen-Peil,” meaning “not a clue” and supposed to characterize the EU, have freely admitted to news organizations that the issue was more about promoting debate about the way the EU is run than about Ukraine’s relation with the EU. “No” supporters cite the adoption of the Ukraine agreement without popular consideration as an example of the anti-democratic EU operation.

The vote also demonstrated voter opposition to further enlargement of the EU since an Association Agreement is seen by some as a precursor to full EU membership. The vote will, according to Rem Korteweg, a Dutch senior research fellow at London’s Centre for European Reform, speaking to Politico, “Slow the accession process down …The Dutch government will find it difficult to agree to enlargement with any state at this juncture.”

Netherlands has minimal trade with Ukraine and supporters of the agreement tried to characterize the vote as a referendum on Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has vehemently denounced the EU agreement. Supporters see Putin as a bully because of his actions in Ukraine. A digitally manipulated poster created by “yes” backers and displayed in the Amsterdam subway showed Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who opposed the agreement, and Putin in a passionate kiss.

With respect to next steps, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said: “My view is that if the turnout is more than 30 percent [which it was], with such a victory for the “no” camp, ratification cannot go ahead without discussion.” It seems unlikely, however, that the Dutch referendum will scrap the agreement which has been in force provisionally since the first of the year. Worst case would likely be a carve out for Netherlands if its parliament reverses the earlier approval vote.

  • World Radio Conference Outcomes

    By Patricia Paoletta, Washington DC

    The latest World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) wrapped up in late November after four long weeks of negotiations between 3400 delegates from around 165 Member States. All in all, the WRC resulted in positive outcomes for both 5G and Wi-Fi, and will benefit both the U.S. and Europe's communications agendas, particularly with respect to the decisions on spectrum to be allocated for the all-important 5G service. The effect will be to ensure the more rapid development of the next generation of mobile broadband in a manner consistent with U.S. planning and existing development.  Debates on 5G dominated the conference, but allocations for high-altitude platform stations (“HAPS”) sought by U.S. based firms were also favorable. As a result, plans to provide additional internet service to underserved areas may be accelerated.

    Read more ...

UMD Jean Monnet Research Project

Infrastructure Planning and Financing: Lessons from Europe and the United States

The University of Maryland has received a Jean Monnet grant from the EU to conduct a series of policy exchanges between Europe and the US on filling infrastructure needs and the utility of public/private partnerships as the financing mechanism. If interested in participating in or receiving more information about these exchanges, please contact Rye McKenzie (rmckenzi@umd.edu).

Read more ...

New from the Bertelsmann Foundation

The Bertelsmann Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan and nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC with a transatlantic perspective on global challenges.

"Edge of a Precipice" by Nathan Crist

"Newpolitik" by Emily Hruban


Summer Course