The list of losers is long, not only the millions of east Europeans who were stranded without power and heating, but also other political leaders, notably Tymoshenko’s pro-Western rival, Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko, according to David Stern of the GlobalPost. He sees Tymoshenko’s negotiations that broke the deadlock as a clear victory for her in the on-going power struggle in Kiev. That internal political dynamic and the on-again, off-again gas wars are related to geopolitical questions such as possible membership for Ukraine in NATO and the EU. In her face-to-face Moscow meetings with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, she got an agreement on more favorable terms than observers had expected – with a new price estimated as 20% less than Moscow had initially demanded. Because she managed to exclude Yushchenko, Tymoshenko emerged as the more capable leader. Mikhailo Pogrebinsky, director of the Kiev Center for Political and Conflict studies, wrote that “she showed herself to be a more acceptable partner for Russia – one with which it is difficult, but in the end possible, to reach agreement.”
Part of her victory was the elimination of RosUkrEnergo, an opaque corporate intermediary owned by Russia’s Gazprom and two small Ukrainian partners. Experts report that this entity functioned as a way of funneling funds to her political rivals in the Ukraine – and apparently to Russian leaders, too. According to the Kyiv Post, President Yushchenko “emerged from the deal looking like an incompetent, corrupt bumbler who got caught trying to prop up the shady RosUkrEnergo for reasons of personal gain.” Other analysts have concluded that Tymoshenko – often dubbed “the gas princess” in Ukraine — also stood up to Putin on this issue. That will help broaden her domestic appeal as someone who is viewed favorably in Moscow, but can in some instances refuse to do Russian bidding where her country’s interest are concerned.