European Institute

This Website Generously Underwritten by
McGraw Hill Companies
EU Institutions
EU and U.S. 'Competing' via their Competition Regimes PDF Print Email
Fall/Winter 2009 Vol. 10, no. 3
Written by John DeQ. Briggs   

The European competition authority is challenging U.S. high-tech companies’ business practices, including some already approved by the anti-trust regulators in Washington.

Read more...
 
Europe Gets a 'Diplomatic Service' PDF Print Email
Fall/Winter 2009 Vol. 10, no. 3
Written by Garret Martin   

Will it succeed in giving the EU a stronger voice on the world stage?

Read more...
 
European Foreign Policy After the Lisbon Treaty PDF Print Email
Roundtables
02/01/10

On February 1, 2010, The European Institute convened a conference to discuss current questions of European foreign policy in light of the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty, a sweeping policy framework entered into force on December 1, 2009. On hand to discuss the significance of Lisbon was Stefan Lehne, the Political Director of the Austrian Ministry for European and International Affairs.  Mr. Lehne’s presentation addressed a wide range of contemporary questions on EU foreign policy and the EU’s role on the diplomatic world stage.

In response to the question “Is there an EU foreign policy?,” Mr. Lehne outlined seven main points. First, he conceded that the “machinery” of the EU created a considerable bureaucracy in which the EU was required to function. Multiple agencies and departments were at the EU’s disposal, he said, but the size of these bodies often slowed down efficient policymaking. Second, Mr. Lehne cited the sheer size of the EU’s offices and described the primary disadvantage of these agencies as a “lack of maneuverability.” Third, Mr. Lehne described the structure for third parties working with the official branches of the EU. Fourth, the Austrian official insisted that the EU “doesn’t lack teeth.” Twenty-eight countries are currently under EU sanctions, he said, and gave examples of the many sanctions and visa restrictions as determinant tools used by the EU in global diplomacy. Fifth, Mr. Lehne cited the EU’s capacity or small-scale crisis management missions all over the world. Sixth, he discussed the EU ‘neighborhood policy’ in relation to the countries sharing borders with non-EU member states. And finally, the official concluded with the issue of enlargement. He credited the EU with contributing to the peaceful transition by ex-Soviet countries into democratic regimes, such as in the case of the Ukraine and its “Rose Revolution,” and termed the EU the “reluctant magnet” for democratic reform in Europe.

Mr. Lehne focused special attention on Lisbon’s implications for relations with and in Washington. The diplomatic face of the EU will take longer to get going, he explained. The practical start of an EU external service will likely kick off five to ten years from the present time. For now, Mr. Lehne predicted, there will continue to be a bilateral focus at the national level – and not at the EU level – between Washington and its European partners.

 
Globalization with a Human Face: the EESC Approach PDF Print Email
Roundtables
10/03/08

Dimitris Dimitriadis, President of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) discussed the impact of globalization on Europe’s employment, investment and innovation and how the European Union is meeting these challenges. The EESC is a consultative body that gives representatives from Europe’s economic, social and academic sectors a formal platform to express their views on EU issues. Its opinions are forwarded to institutions including the European Council, European Commission, and European Parliament. Dr. Philip Levy, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and trade advisor to the McCain Campaign, presented the U.S. perspective on the effects of trade and globalization on employment and innovation.

 
Independence and Regulatory Roles of U.S. and European Central Banks Get a Fiery Political Trial PDF Print Email
February – March 2010
Written by Written by J. Paul Horne   

As the “Great Recession” recedes, the aftershocks of public anger are exploding with a political passion not seen since the Great Depression.. In this tumult, knives are out for the two leading central banks – the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB), the agencies responsible for monetary policies underpinning the world’s most important economies and markets.

Read more...
 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 4