European Institute

This Website Generously Underwritten by
McGraw Hill Companies
Summer/Fall 2007

“Fortress Europe” Overtones Heard

E-mail Print

This piece is excerpted from comments by a non-EU participant (who could not be further identified) at a meeting of The European Institute Defense Roundtable.

If NATO is not the place to go for armaments cooperation, we should look towards the European Defense Agency (EDA) and the European Commission, especially on homeland security issues. I think this is an area which absolutely should be pursued. Of course, EDA’s first foray did not succeed: it was the effort with armored fighting vehicles. There was a study that found 23 different national armored fighting-vehicle programs in Europe. That is crazy. NATO is affected by this because allies are deploying to Afghanistan with different kinds of equipment and without common logistics, common supplies, and common ways to do maintenance. In Provincial Reconstruction Teams, with five or six different countries manning them, everybody’s got different gear there, so I hope that the EDA re-attacks on this issue of armored fighting vehicles, and also with similar types of situations. There is no reason why we should have this many different programs. And I think it is entirely within the prerogatives of the EDA and its board of defense ministers to tackle this. This is money wasted.


Recently I read the EU defense ministers’ statement on Europe’s “defense and technological industrial base study.” It was very well crafted, a worthwhile effort by the EU to come at this issue of harmonizing disparate programs, not at a programmatic level but at a strategic level. But as I read the document, it really got my blood boiling. As a defense ministerial communiqué, it had – and I saw it – a recognition of the need to try to get our hands around the technological base in Europe. But whose hands?

I saw fortress Europe in the document [titled A Strategy for the European Defense Technological and Industrial Bases]. In it, I read the paragraph, in particular, that starts identifying technologies, with its little subparagraph in there that screamed to me “fortress Europe.” [At this point, he referred to the communiqué’s heading about identifying key technologies]. It said:

“We need to identify, from a European perspective, the key defense technologies that we must seek to preserve or develop. Military capability need is the prime criterion, but we must also have regard to the needs of autonomy and operational sovereignty, and the need to sustain pre-eminence where this is economically valuable.”

At the same time, if well-intentioned governments come at it from the standpoint of pursuing teaming arrangements, then I think there is promise, there is a path to offset the decline in defense spending and the overall decline in capability. I also think that technology is moving on in ways that enable us to do more and different kinds of cooperation. Technology has evolved to the point where we can actually fashion a deployable battle management capability that different nations then can come to the fight and put their French Sam-T right next to the Patriot Missile Defense System, right next to the S300 that Greece has – you name it, it can be deployed. This is exactly the right path upon which we should be, and it is a path that I think the EU also is looking to pursue.

A good example is software-defined radios. Now NATO has been working on interoperability of communications systems for 50 years and we still haven’t fixed these interoperability problems. But from modern computing to the ability to use software to bridge wave form cultural differences – you name it – there is great promise.

For example, the software defined radio idea alone has got enormous potential for suddenly allowing units from different countries to all communicate on the same wave form. And you get, out of this whole mess about national crypto – and whose particular architectural standard we are working on – a CD-ROM. Whether it is NATO standard or EU standard, it is a CD-ROM: You put it in your computer, in your radio, and now you will be able to talk to whoever also has the same CD-ROM.

Whether you are first responders; whether you are on the commission side of the house, hospital, firemen, others that need to be able to interoperate in a domestic civil emergency kind of situation; or whether you are talking about getting NATO forces to be able to communicate better with the Pakistanis or Afghan national forces, or even with each other.

So again, I see great promise there. You are able to maximize – computers, computers, computers – the use of what you already have.

 

U.S Industry Also Chafes at Export Restrictions

E-mail Print

This is an excerpt of an article by William Matthews in the U.S. publication, Defense News, on May 23, 2007.

Here’s something you might not have expected to find on the U.S. munitions list: toilets. But along with missile-guidance systems, night vision goggles, torpedoes, tanks, radars and nuclear warheads, the State Department requires a special license to export toilets if they are to be installed in military aircraft.


Zodiac of North America, the company that makes inflatable boats used by U.S. Marines, SEALs and special forces, found out the hard way.

The company also makes the kind of toilets that are installed in commercial airliners, said Jean-Jacques Marie, Zodiac’s president. But when Zodiac attempted to sell some overseas for use on military planes, the company learned it would need the same State Department approval as if it were selling bombsights.

Marie recounted his company’s experience during a gathering of U.S. and European business executives and government officials at The European Institute’s Transatlantic Roundtable on Defense and Security in May at which participants complained about restrictions they said hurt defense companies and keep the U.S. military from working efficiently with their allies… For Britain’s BAE Systems, which has a U.S. branch that employs 45,000 U.S. workers, U.S. trade restrictions mean engineers can’t be moved from one part of the company to the other without getting U.S. government approval, according to Peter Lichtenbaum, BAE’s vice president for regulatory compliance and international policy.

One result is that European companies are trying to design U.S.-made parts out of their products…

Mark Esper, vice president of the U.S. trade group, Aerospace Industries Association, suggested urging U.S. combatant commanders…to explain to Congress that it would benefit U.S. troops if U.S. allies were able to acquire night vision goggles, radios and other equipment now kept off limits by export controls.

 

Eurozone: A New Global Context Favors Long-Term Growth

E-mail Print

Yves MerschThe economic prospects of Europe and other parts of the world have traditionally hinged on the U.S. economy. Now most economists concur with the view that the U.S. economy is sneezing. Yet this time the rest of the world is not expected to catch a cold. Why not? Why is there so much confidence that the euro area can successfully decouple its economic trajectory from the current U.S. slowdown? Let me lay out some thoughts in this regard in the context provided by recent macroeconomic developments – at the global level, in the U.S. and in Europe.

Let me start with the global macroeconomic environment. The dynamism of the world economy since its rebound in mid-2003 has been exceptional both in the pace of growth and its duration. Cyclical factors, underpinned by favorable financing conditions, have supported this expansion. But, equally so, it is likely that there is also a structural trend favoring a rising path for world growth.


For example, the integration of the eastern European economies into the global trading system, followed by China and India, is one such structural factor. The “catch-up” potential of these economies is so large that it is unlikely that trend for growth will revert soon.

This year we are likely to witness a mild drop of global growth to slightly below five percent, according to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) recent World Economic Outlook report. Despite this moderation of growth, the favorable macroeconomic situation is expected to continue. As overall global growth continues to be rebalanced – away from the U.S. to the euro area and Japan – the risk of a more abrupt global slowdown continues to abate. While the U.S. economy can expect sub-par growth and the euro area will probably ease (from 2.8 percent growth in 2006 to 2.5 percent in 2007), the current expansion in Japan is set to continue at the pace it enjoyed in 2006. Emerging economies, particularly in Asia, seem set to continue robust growth. So the spillover effects of U.S. developments, including a soft landing for the economy, should be contained.

The latest episode in the ongoing correction of the U.S. housing market, notably the bankruptcies of 40 “sub-prime” (i.e. high risk) mortgage lenders, is, technically speaking, a sign that some lenders failed in their risk appraisals because, in this sector, a significant number of borrowers have defaulted on their loans in a situation where house prices have merely stabilized, not fallen, after a period of exuberant rises. A contained correction in the U.S. housing market is welcome because it prevents a further build-up of the prevalent disequilibrium. In addition, there are benefits in the market failure of lenders in this category. For one thing, it halts the aggressive lending practices that have partially nurtured the run-up of house prices. And, second, it reminds us of the risks involved – risks that should be assessed and priced accordingly. So far, there are no visible knock-on effects to the prime segment of the mortgage market. With this, and provided the labor market remains in good shape (and it is, according to the latest employment data), one can be fairly assured that the U.S. economy will weather these challenges – even if figures for the first quarter in 2007 do not look too good.

Taking a more pessimistic view, one could say that the housing adjustment remains incomplete (inventories continue amounting to more than eight months’ stock of unsold properties). So if the risk of adjustment would materialize, the resulting damage to the “wealth-effect” could cause a drop in demand. In its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF foresees U.S. growth slowing to 2.2 percent in 2007 and 2.8 percent in 2008.

Keep in mind that the slowdown in the U.S. economy has not come as a surprise. The Federal Reserve Board (the U.S. central bank), like international bodies, had anticipated this moderation of growth and factored it into their projections, together with an adjustment scenario for redressing global imbalances. Overall, the economic slowdown stems mainly from adverse developments in the housing market, mainly the residential investment component. So the primary issue is domestic in nature. If concerns remain confined to the housing market, there is unlikely to be any severe direct consequences for the euro area.

Recent studies have tried to quantify the spillover effects from a potential hard-landing scenario in the U.S., and they have also concluded that the impact would be fairly muted on growth in the euro area. The European Central Bank staff has estimated that a one percent point cut in GDP growth in the U.S. would lower growth in the euro area by a mere 0.2 percent point. These results encompass the effects passed through direct and indirect trade channels and are in line with recent estimates by the European Commission. It also estimated that, if these trade effects were to be compounded by spillovers (through balance sheets, equity markets and other channels affecting general levels of confidence), the impact could increase to 0.5 percent points in two years. An additional 10 percent depreciation of the dollar vis-à-vis the euro could raise the impact to 0.8 percent points. Of course, these scenarios assume that the correction in the U.S. housing market is not further exacerbated by a weaker labor market. If that negative contagion occurred, a more thorough reassessment of the growth outlook would be necessary.

Overall, seven global risk factors have evolved in diverging directions since September 2006. On the one hand, there are now reduced risks for: recession in the U.S. housing market; a disruption in oil supply; a disorderly unwinding of global imbalances and inflation. On the other hand, there are higher upside risks for slumping domestic demand in the European Union and decline in growth in emerging markets. And there is an increased downside risk for financial stability.

While macroeconomic risks are moderating, credit risk has increased. Global markets seem to have been rather unimpressed by the current U.S. slowdown. The financial market jitters observed in late February appear to have only been a short episode. But assets of all kinds continue to be priced at high levels: Large amounts of liquidity are chasing comparatively rather scarce assets, so we observe low pricing of risks and flat yield curves. And long-term interest rates are strikingly low. These easy financing conditions have led to a rising “risk appetite,” reflected in leveraged buyouts, mortgage lending and carry trades. If a volatility shock triggered a market correction, the impact could be amplified by leveraged positions and uncertainties about risk concentration, notably in less liquid secondary markets for innovative financial products. But while pockets of vulnerability have increased in household and corporate sectors, on average financial positions remain sound and the financial sector appears resistant to shocks.

The shift of power in terms of credit creation from banks to the market with Hedge Funds and Private Equity Pools with much higher multipliers than banks risks loosening the transmission channel of central bank monetary policy, and this new situation is largely untested in stress. As Jacques de Larosière [Chairman of the Strategic Committee of the French Treasury] said recently: “High asset valuations and low risk pricing are, as they have always been, a source of vulnerability, because they can well be reversed.”

Let me now come back to the euro area. As you know, 2006 was a very good year for growth and the European Central Bank’s (ECB) Governing Council accompanied the upswing with a series of moderate increases in the key policy interest rates. These were aimed at progressively normalizing the level of interest rates and anchoring inflation expectations. These developments have continued in the first quarter of 2007. Business activity appears to remain strong, and in March the Governing Council decided on another moderate increase in interest rates. So far, our decisions at the ECB have proven right. Our interest rate increases were well received by financial markets; inflation expectations remain in line with price stability; and real GDP growth is projected to remain robust throughout 2007 and beyond.

So where do we stand today? What is important to note is that nowadays growth in the euro area depends less on external developments than domestic developments as the main drivers. There is however no room for complacency. Both our economic and monetary analyses confirm that the risks to inflation in the medium term remain on the upside. Among the upward pressures are: the evolution of input prices for manufacturing; the increased pricing power of companies in the services sector; recent survey data and the evolution of producer prices. There are risks of higher oil prices as well as trends in administered prices and in indirect taxes. In addition, there is ample liquidity; growth is strong in money supply and in credit – and interest rates remain moderate. In this environment – strong GDP growth and increases in employment accompanied by falling unemployment – the Governing Council of the ECB keeps stressing the need for moderate wage developments. The goal is to limit inflationary pressures from the wage side. In considering the evolution of interest rates, we have to disentangle structural versus cyclical effects. Looking ahead, as slack vanishes, we have to watch resource constraints, capacity building, the results of structural change, developments in productivity and in potential growth – while interpreting developments in money and credit growth. By acting in a firm and timely manner, we can preserve price stability and, by doing so, continue contributing to an environment of sustainable growth in the euro area.

Yves Mersch is Governor of the Banque Centrale du Luxembourg and a member of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank. This article is based on a presentation at The European Institute’s Transatlantic Roundtable of Finance and Monetary Affairs in April 2007 in Washington.

 

Global highlights and local sidelights culled from the media (April - June 2007)

E-mail Print

AMSTERDAM: Dutch Reality TV on Kidney Shortage a Hoax

Three contestants were competing for a dying woman’s kidney. The Dutch TV reality-show, which received widespread criticism, was revealed as a hoax. Lisa, the 37-year-old “donor” – who was in fact an actress – was to choose her kidney’s recipient based on the contestants’ history, and conversation with their family and friends.


The real purpose of the show was recently disclosed. “We have only done this cry for help because we want to solve a problem that shouldn’t be a problem,” a producer told a news conference after the show. Indeed, while “the donor” may have been acting, the three people vying for an organ were in fact real patients in need of a kidney transplant.

Dutch Culture Minister Ronald Plasterk hailed the show as a “fantastic stunt.” Caroline Klingers, a kidney patient who was watching the program from a treatment center, praised the hoax because of the greater publicity on the issue it had raised. Nearly 200 people die each year in the Netherlands while waiting for a kidney.

- BBC News

 

************************

 

ANKARA: Turkey is World’s “Most Anti-U.S. Country”

In this year’s annual global poll by the Pew Research Center, Turkey ranked as the world’s “most anti-U.S. country.”

“The Pew Research Center said that only nine percent of Turks have favorable views of the United States. The figure for Turkish support of the United States in 2000 was 52 percent, and has since declined steadily. Pew director Andrew Kohut said… that when last year’s poll indicated 12 percent Turkish support for the U.S., he did not think the figure would fall down further.”

Furthermore, 81 percent of Turks expressed dislike for “American ideas of democracy.”

Support for the EU has also significantly diminished. The Pew poll indicated that only 27 percent of Turks had a favorable view of the EU, down from 58 percent in 2004. The proportion of unfavorable opinion has, in turn, increased from 35 percent to 58 percent.

– Turkish Daily News

 

************************

 

BELGRADE: Kosovo Outcome Likely to Turn Serbia Away from the West and Toward Russia

Serbia’s government… is deeply divided between pro-Western and nationalist forces… facing a choice between moving towards European integration or on to a more isolationist path. The government’s composition, deep mistrust among many of its members and the parliament’s nationalist majority suggest it will follow the second option. Pro-Western forces have suffered a significant setback, the government is vulnerable to manipulation by the security services and oligarchs, and [responsibilities] are divided among the security services. Although Kosovo independence could destabilize the ruling coalition, the government may surprise and last far longer and prove more stable than expected. The West should prepare for Serbia turning increasingly away from Europe and towards Moscow.

The EU and U.S. have given away most of their leverage through repeated concessions and now have even fewer policy tools with which to influence Belgrade than before...[So] Brussels and Washington should resist the temptation of appeasing Serbia further in a misguided effort to purchase acceptance of Kosovo’s independence…The real point of contention between the two [ruling coalition parties] will be foreign policy [as one party] attempts to continue nationalist and confrontational policies and [tries] to hide Milosevic-era nationalist policies behind pro-Western inclinations [of the other party], making it difficult for Washington and Brussels to confront Serbia effectively on key issues… A parliament-authorized dictatorship could become a real threat following a Kosovo status decision. The West may well have to accustom itself to a Serbia that for a number of years is anti-Europe, pro-Russia and unrepentant in its dangerously self-destructive nationalism.

– International Crisis Group

 

************************

 

BERLIN: Anti-Americanism is Free

A recent German poll revealed that 48 percent of Germans believe the United States to be more dangerous than Iran, with only 31 percent of those polled thinking the opposite.

Anti-Americanism is erroneously widespread in Germany, according to Claus Christian Malzahn. In the political arena, he asserts that “taking a swing at the Yanks” is a nearly-guaranteed way to climb up in slumping public opinion polls. He laments that today “anti-Americanism is the wonder drug of German politics.”

Malzahn labels this behavior “hypocrisy at its finest” because while Germans insult Americans, they are doing so in front of made-in-U.S.A. TV shows. He also puts forth that Germany “can claim that the Americans have themselves to blame for terrorism, while at the same time calling for tougher restrictions on Muslim immigration to Germany.” He believes that the verbal hostility and mockery of the United States is really meant “to boost German feeling of self-righteousness” at a relatively-low cost.

Malzahn recalls, in contrast, when Dutch entertainer Rudi Carell produced a short TV sketch, that aired on German TV and portrayed the Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini in women’s underwear, he received death threats. Cancelled flights to Germany and the expulsion of German diplomats from Tehran followed. Malzahn concludes that “jokes about fat Americans are just safer.”

–Der Spiegel

 

************************

 

BRUSSELS: Google Agrees Changes on Privacy

For the second time in the past four months, “Google has announced changes to its privacy policy in response to pressure from the Article 29 working party, a group of national officials that advises the European Union on privacy policy” based on worries that Google searches and cookies could be used to create profiles of the political affiliation or sexual orientation of individuals.

In response, last March, Google decided to reduce its storage time to between 18 months and two years. Officials though told Google that the measures were insufficient and that the new storage period “does not seem to meet the requirements” of European law.

David Bradshaw, an analyst at the research group Ovum, said that “the really big danger for Google is not so much that relations with the EU blow up but that it will come to be seen as not very caring of privacy by the user community.

In fact, Privacy International, a UK-based human rights group, declared that Google had an “entrenched hostility to privacy,” after a six-month long study, the group rated Google as the worst of 23 sites while companies such as Microsoft and Ebay were ranked more favorably.

–Financial Times

 

************************

 

DUBLIN: Lessons for Spain

Success in Ireland inspires hopes in many countries, such as Spain, that are home to separatist demands. Parallels can be drawn between the situations in Spain and Ireland. There are however two main differences.

“The first difference is that British governments seem less exercised about any threat that a part of their country might one day break away. If a clear majority in Northern Ireland – or in Scotland, for that matter – voted for independence, most politicians in London would accept the result. In contrast, all governments in Madrid remain pathologically hostile to any such idea anywhere in Spain.

“The second difference is that support for the Northern Ireland peace process was wholly bipartisan. The Labour opposition at Westminster firmly backed the Tories in their negotiations with Dublin and with Sinn Fein, under both Margaret Thatcher and John Major. Similarly, the Conservative opposition has been solidly behind Tony Blair… The People’s Party (PP) has fiercely resisted Zapatero’s every move over the Basque problem. The party remains bitter about its unexpected loss of the March 2004 election, which fell a few days after the Madrid train bombings. It was brave, if perhaps naive, of Zapatero to try to make peace in the Basque region on his own. But the PP’s hostility made his task vastly more difficult. A prerequisite for future plans to deal with ETA must be that the two main parties in Spain find common ground first.”

–The Economist

 

************************

 

FLORENCE: Counter-Terrorism Changes

U.S. counter-terrorism officials are adopting a more cooperative tone, freer from previous “American triumphalism,’’ according to Karen Greenberg, executive director of the NYU Law School Center for Law and Security, and organizer of an annual high-level Transatlantic conference on counter-terrorism in Florence. U.S. officials attending the closed-door meeting declined to be interviewed, but National Public Radio quoted Greenberg saying that this year “no one said we’re not in trouble,” referring to the Iraq war.

Former White House counter-terrorism official Roger Cressey also noted the change in attitude, remarking that until recently in this field “decisions were made in Washington without any regard for how they would be felt here in Europe.” He said that “restoring U.S. credibility vis-à-vis its European allies and the Muslim world” will be a priority for the next administration.

An alarming trend in Britain was explained by Peter Clark, head of Britain’s anti-terrorism branch of the police. Home-grown terrorism has become the overriding concern, he said, especially because of a growing “disconnect between public opinion and law enforcement.” According to Clark, “the police service have been accused of exaggerating the threat posed by terrorism in order, it is alleged, to help the government justify its foreign policy.” Clarke said that Muslim communities, often doubtful that the police and government are acting for their interest, do not provide information. He warned that “the lack of public trust in intelligence is in danger of infecting the relationship between the police and the communities we serve.”

–National Public Radio

 

************************

 

MINSK: “Bring Condoms” Requirement

Poles crossing Belarus’s border must now be in possession of, not only a first-aid kit, but also condoms. Since this recent demand by Bielorussian border authorities, condom sales on the Polish/Belarus border have soared.

To the many that believe this to be a joke, Polish priest Piotr Mrozik will tell them it’s not funny. “Imagine the salesman’s face at the gas station when I arrived, with my white collar, and asked him for a box of Durex. I was very embarrassed” declared the priest, who was heading to a Polish church in Belarus.

Authorities are denying the existence of such practices, despite the complaints of several Polish travelers. “It must be a rumor, but if otherwise, I will make sure to intervene” stated Aleksander Koncki, from the Bielorussian consulate in Poland.

–Dziennik

 

************************

 

PARIS: The Gaul of it! Asterix too French?

The French comic book character Asterix is known to petits et grands as the valliant protector of ancient Gaul from stereotyped foreigners – from “Brits who drink hot water with a dash of milk” to “the Corsicans he has ribbed for being work-shy, violent and producing explosively-smelly cheese.”

Asterix’s place in today’s multicultural France was recently contested… When Asterix’s illustrator, Albert Uderzo, offered the hero’s services as illustration to the text of the UN Charter for children’s rights, some complained.

Angelique Chrisafis explains that Jean-Pierre Rozenczveig, of Defense for Children International, said that Asterix and his mission as defender of Gaul were not representative of a modern, multicultural society. The hero “resisting the invaders” was a bad choice to defend a France “aspiring to a happy and peaceful coexistence of all its diverse groups” he declared.

France’s children’s ombudsman, Dominique Versini, dismissed the brawl. “The Gauls show no sign of surrender” writes Angelique Chrisafis.

–The Guardian

 

************************

 

PARIS: U-turn on Chinese Arms Embargo Lift

Ahead of the change of president in France, the campaign marked the end of the Chirac era, notably the arms embargo on China. The three main presidential contenders (Royal, Sarkozy, Bayrou) oppose the idea of lifting the arms embargo on China, one of Chirac’s biggest diplomatic initiatives vis-à-vis Beijing.

In unison with former chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schroeder, Chirac had worked to lift the arms embargo [imposed on China by the EU in 1989 following the Tiananmen Square massacre.] The Franco-German alliance failed on the issue, overpowered by the double resistance coming from other EU member states that refused to sacrifice a moral stance that would permit France to sell its arms, and coming from the United States that did not want to see their European “allies” equip a potential Chinese threat.

Schroeder’s position was already reversed by Merkel, and Chirac’s has now also been buried by the three candidates, including Sarkozy. Enough to assure nostalgia in Beijing after Chirac’s departure and to wonder what will happen after the election. Although one should note that Bayrou is the most categorical on maintaining the ban, while Royal and Sarkozy are more sensible to Chinese dispositions.

–www.Rue89.com

 

************************

 

RIGA: Baltic Unity A La Carte?

Oft-proclaimed Baltic solidarity suffered a dent when Latvia failed to give its support this spring to neighboring Estonia in the dispute that suddenly flared with Russia over the fate of a Communist-era statue in Tallinn commemorating the Soviet “Bronze Soldier.” The statue is a memorial to Russians and a past Soviet repression by many Estonians. It was relocated, along with the remains of Soviet soldiers, from central Tallinn to an out-of-town military cemetery. The move triggered outrage from Russia and among Estonia’s Russian minority (about 25 percent of the population).

When Estonia’s leader visited Latvia in the midst of the crisis, the Baltic fault lines were on display in the lukewarm Latvian support for Estonia in its confrontation with Moscow. Riga previously had always been at the forefront in defending cooperation between the Baltic states, mainly out of Latvians’ desire to avoid ever having to stand alone against Russia. But since Latvia joined NATO (and the EU) and has found new allies (outside the Baltic circle), Riga’s fears of a one-on-one face-off with Russia have lessened.

These changes in the regional balance of power seem to have altered some old reflexes. Nowadays, the Baltic states only demonstrate solidarity when unity aligns with their national interests. Estonia’s decision to relocate the statue have, and will, be an example of the new tests on the solidarity of the Baltic states – both vis-à-vis their old relationship to Moscow and also vis-à-vis their new relationships with Brussels.

–Latvijas Avize

 

************************

 

WARSAW: Polish Ultra-Conservative Dismissed (by Foes) as “Provocateur’’

In Poland, radical right-wing politician Roman Giertych, 36, has proved very successful in courting the political spotlight. As head of the League of Polish Families, a nationalist political party that is the junior coalition partner in government, he was appointed Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Education last year and, since then, has repeatedly ignited controversy that has garnered the media spotlight at home and internationally – not always in flattering terms.

His latest proposal, announced in May, centered on censoring the required-reading lists in Polish schools. Among other proposed restrictions was a ban on the works of Goethe, Dostoevsky, Kafka, Gombrowicz and Josef Conrad [– a native Pole who “betrayed” his native tongue to write in his adopted language, English].

[Any such notion was promptly dismissed by Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski. “If this was a joke, it wasn’t a good one,’’ he said, chiding Mr. Giertych for his “exhibitionist’s desire to be provocative in order to ‘exist’ politically.”] The censorship project was shelved, but plans remain to put works by John Paul II into the curriculum to propagate among students the Christian (and patriotic) values contained in the late Polish-born Pope’s writings.

Last June Mr. Giertych stupefied Poland’s teachers by decreeing that 53,000 high-school students who had failed their final exams should graduate and get diplomas anyway because the tests were “too hard.” Subsequently, Polish courts ruled that his action was unconstitutional and outlawed any repetition of such ministerial interference.

Mr. Giertych has scored some points – including a new slogan for the school system (“order, patriotism, excellence, truth”) that resonates ominously with dark times in Europe’s recent past. Early this year high-school principals were told to report the names of all pregnant students to the education ministry as part of Mr. Giertych’s efforts to set up a special “help system” for unwed mothers.

Other initiatives of his have been well received by the intelligentsia in Poland – for example, his plans to lower the age for starting school from seven to six and to make foreign language-classes a requirement in elementary schools.

–Le Monde

 

************************

 

WASHINGTON: Muslim Immigrants Assimilate Better than in Europe

The nearly 2.5 million Muslims living in the United States are “largely assimilated, happy with their lives, and moderate with respect to many of the issues that have divided Muslims and Westerners around the world,” according to a major survey of American Muslims, the first of its scope.

Muslims in the U.S., although largely foreign-born, are nonetheless notably American in their beliefs. Embracing American work ethic values, 71 percent of the United States’ Muslims agree that most people who want to get ahead in the U.S. can make it if they are willing to work hard. Overall, they believe that Muslims coming to the U.S. should try and adopt American customs, according to the survey. While 47 percent of Muslim Americans think of themselves as Muslim before American, the comparable figures for Muslims are much higher in Britain (81 percent), Germany (66 percent) and Spain (69 percent); in France, it is lower (46 percent).

Survey charts showed that American Muslims’ income and education levels closely parallel those of the general population: the percentage of low-income Muslims among the Muslim minority is two points higher than the American average whereas the percentage of low-income Muslims runs between 18 and 24 percent higher than the general average in France, Spain, Germany and Britain.

“Muslim Americans reject Islamic extremism by larger margins than do Western European Muslims”, but fewer native African-American Muslims completely condemn al-Qaeda than do other American Muslims. Also, “younger Muslims in the U.S are much more likely than older Muslim Americans to say that suicide bombing can be at least sometimes justified.”

–Pew Research Center for the People and the Press

 


Page 5 of 7